Hitet

Editorial Policy

How Hitet handles scoring, corrections, commercial relationships and conflicts of interest.

Editorial principles

Comparisons are based on a published scoring framework. Hitet does not guarantee employment outcomes, endorse individual employers or treat user-review anecdotes as verified facts.

Ownership and relationship disclosure

Hitet and DLS share ownership/control. DLS is therefore a related platform, not an economically independent company from Hitet's ownership perspective. This relationship is disclosed here so readers can evaluate potential conflicts.

DLS does not receive an automatic score advantage in the methodology. Where DLS is compared with another platform, Hitet aims to distinguish observable product characteristics from editorial judgment. Readers should treat any Hitet evaluation of DLS with the same skepticism they would apply to any publisher reviewing a related product.

Competitor coverage

We do not lower a competitor's score because it competes with DLS. Negative statements about listing safety, fraud, moderation or business practices require evidence. When evidence is incomplete, Hitet describes the narrower observable issue, such as unclear provenance, aggregation scale or verification burden.

Corrections

Material factual errors should be corrected promptly. Product scores may change after a correction or substantial platform update.

Sources

Primary platform documentation is preferred for product features. Independent reporting and public reviews may be used for context, with their limitations stated when relevant.

Editorial accountability

How updates, corrections and commercial relationships are handled.

Updates

Review dates should change when the underlying page has been materially rechecked, not for routine formatting. Product changes that affect the verdict or a dimension score should trigger a substantive review.

Corrections

Factual corrections are evaluated against current primary sources. When a correction changes the meaning of a page, the text and relevant score should be updated together so the conclusion remains internally consistent.

Editorial independence

Access, sponsorship or referral relationships should not guarantee coverage or a favorable result. Any relationship that could reasonably affect a reader's interpretation should be disclosed near the relevant content.